Why do human beings mask the truth?
Something I noticed about this play that bothered me is the general dynamic the play lies on by not saying directly that Farid’s brother is a homosexual. I understand that this is a play for little kids, never-the-less, misinforming the audience about an important topic by oversimlifying it and, as a result, avoid it is vulgar enough to annoy me.
The character that best represents my point is Farid’s mother, which (oh, surprise) acts as a typical conservative mother which has to suppresse her homophobic tendencies to accept and love once again her first born. Before doing this, she constantly avoids telling Farid that his brother is a homosexual by calling him “different”.
So, is this play trying to brake the taboo of homosexuality by treating it like a taboo? Not a great plan.
To start the comparison, it’s sure to affirm that Farid’s mother is the character of the play which is the most different from me. Because she is the type of person that doesn’t express things as they are, always puting things in different shades to mask reality. Personally I think she would answer my philosophical concern by saying something like: “Oh child, do not say that. Stop thinking those things, you could get in trouble.” And I think she would likely answer that because that’s basicly the attitude most of people 0f her age have (more acuurately if they are dogmatic persons) , or something between those lines.
The sad thing about this is that a philosophical reflection cannot be fullfilled when this attittude prevails, dogma is the general rule…
For my part, I think human beings mask the truth because each one of us accepts the truth that we can understand. Most people believe that they know, but there’s a huge diffetence between believing that one knows and knowing that one knows. And to affirm that homosexuality is bad or unntural is not based on theories or facts, but in old dogmas. For those like me who want to learn, in order to know the nature behind homosexuality, I read a breaf explanation given by Richard Dawkins, name that is unknown for most of the homophobes.
They don’t want to know, they want to believe they know; but as I said earlier, each one of us accepts the truth either one of us can understand. In the case of Farid’s mother, she accepted homosexuality for a personal reason, not because she understood the nature of it. Which, I think is good enough but still, there’s to rationality there, no place to have any debate without falling into fallacies.
In conclusion, this play awoke this philosophical concern because it is very frustraiting for me that in our daily lifes one cannot trust fully in the information given by the people that surrounds us; it is very sad for me to notice that “non-thinking” books make us think more than the thinking people that live on Earth.
We see the fallen leaves that were before a living part of the trees they surround; next, they will be part of the ground in which the trees stand.